CHAOS IN PRINT

MIDNIGHT RAMBLINGS

MOVIE REVIEWS

PHOTO GALLERY

POLLS

MESSAGE FORUM

GUESTBOOK

OLD STUFF

LINKS

CONTACT ME




Chaos In A Box
A Chick Flick Disguised as an Action Film
Chaos In Print
Week of February 13, 2006

It’s always kind of amazing to go back and re-visit an incredibly popular film. No matter how much loved they are in the time they are released…no matter how many awards they win…they soon fade from public consciousness, save for a few members of a fanatical cult following. And then, when you dig out your dusty old DVD that you bought in the last spurt of mania over the movie, it becomes a time capsule, reminding you of the time when the movie came out. I’ve been going through this quite a bit lately, as I’ve been buying a lot of brand- new special editions of these films. And the one I’m talking about specifically seems to sum up the 1990s and its times: Titanic.

I remember reading the tale of a woman who locked herself in a movie theatre and watched it for 5 days straight. Who could forget how crazy the world went for a gigantic historical epic from the man who brought us the Terminator films? I remember reading the tale of a woman who locked herself in a movie theatre and watched it for 5 days straight. You couldn’t walk down the street without someone greeting you with “My heart will go on” or “I’ll never let go.” And that stupid Celene Dion song was played on the radio non-stop. Granted, its effect on pop culture is still being felt. Here we are now, some 8 years after its original release, and just about every idiot riding in a boat – from a tiny little fishing dingy to the mightiest of cruise ships – has to stand at the bow and scream, “I’m king of the world!” Why was this film so popular? Why is it still so popular?

I, personally, still enjoy the film purely as a technical achievement. James Cameron, the writer/director, has always been one of those directors who seems to pride himself on pushing the current technology to the limits, and creating the new technology when the current fails. And he really went all-out with Titanic. First, he actually dove to the wreck of the ship to film it, a process that required actually designing and building a special movie camera to work at the ocean depths. (Trivia note: those underwater cameras were designed and built by Cameron’s brother Michael, an engineer.) From there, it was down to Mexico, where he re-built 80% of the ship at full scale in a tank of water. And then, he pushed the limits of visual effects technology at the time to actually make the ship sail. Cameron developed and pioneered techniques that went into making other historical epics, such as Gladiator and Troy. Special effects junkie that I am, you just got to stand back and admire all that.

Granted, it’s not Attack of the Clones cheesy, but it can get a little bad. But the vast majority of the movie-going public isn’t nerds. They wouldn’t as deeply get into the technical stuff like I do. And watching it again after all these years, the film has more than its fair share of flaws. Some of the romantic dialogue in some scenes is rather cheesy. Granted, it’s not Attack of the Clones cheesy, but it can get a little bad. And I, personally, have always had a few problems with the scale of the Titanic. In some scenes, it’s positively massive. In other scenes (generally the ones involving the full-size ship they built), it just seems…smaller. But still we can overlook that. What makes Titanic work?

Firstly, the characters. You can’t deny that there are some pretty likable characters. Who doesn’t want to live the life of Jack Dawson, a simple vagabond artist, travelling the world? And we all sneer at Cal Hockley, our dastardly villain who wants to put the lovely Rose into a life of servitude. There were lots of good characters who were cut, too. In the deleted scenes, we see that there was a very minor subplot concerning Titanic’s radio operators. (“They were the computer nerds of their era,” says Cameron on the commentary.) Plus, you know, naked Kate Winslet.

It is, quite simply, the Disney animated formula writ large. But I think that Titanic endures because of the simplicity of its plot. It is, quite simply, the Disney animated formula writ large. Rose is our plucky princess, who is trapped by her position and dreams of high adventure out there. Jack is our Prince Charming who can show her that world. Cal is the dastardly villain who wants the princess for his own, and he’s even got his snivelling henchman in the form of Mr. Lovejoy. All you have to do is turn Molly Brown into a talking animal, throw in some musical numbers, and Titanic is a Disney animated movie.

And that’s it. At the end of the day, Titanic is the fairy tale that we all want. We all want a Jack who’ll take us away from all this, or Rose that we can save. It’s a simple archetype that’s been in stories for centuries, and Titanic is the latest interpretation of it. The massive, $200 million backdrop is just for a simple love story.

The cult of Titanic has now faded somewhat. It’s been fun revisiting it with its brand-new 3-disc special edition. But now, it goes back on the DVD shelf, to sit again, gathering dust, waiting to be rediscovered once more.

Comment on this Column
Return to the Columns Page


© Mark Sladen Cappis, 2006

Check out these sections of the archive!

The As Of Yet Untitled Current Chapter of My Life - August 2003 – present

Scarecrow Goes to Japan - August 2002 – March 2003

Life Changes - January 2002 – June 2002

The Vancouver Series - October 2001 – December 2001

Bag Boy Blues - April 2000 – September 2001

Unemployed Bliss - July 1999 – March 2000

The College Years - 1996 – 1999

The Forum - Once you're done reading up on my life, head off to the message board to sound off on how cool or how pathetic I am!